ANNEX 9-A Detail Scoring for Evaluation of the Concept Note For JSMP II and JUMP II

[JSMP II]

1. Relevance of the action [30 Marks]

1.1 How relevant is the proposal to the objectives and priorities of the Call for Proposals? (10 Marks )

a. Is the proposal in line with the overall and specific objectives of the respective Grant Schemes?
- Yes ( 3 marks ) - No ( 0 Mark)
b. To what extent, the proposed action responds to the different priorities identified in the guidelines?
– No Priority ( 0 Mark)
– 1 Priority ( 2 Marks)
- more than 1 Priority (3 Marks)
c. The overall idea of the proposal is relevant and convincing in relation to the overall and specific objectives and priorities?
– No ( 0 Mark) – Yes ( 4 Marks)
1.2 How relevant to the particular needs and constraints of the target country(ies) or region(s) is the proposal? (Including synergy with other EU initiatives and avoidance of duplication)? (10 Marks )
a. Has the proposed action a clear identification of the needs and constraints facing the Firm/Applicant?
- No need mentioned (1 mark)
- Identification of needs/problems or constrains facing the applicant/Firm without Justification ( 2 mark )
- Identification with Justification ( 3 marks )
b. Has the proposed action a clear identification of the needs and constraints facing the Region/Country?
- No need mentioned (1 mark)
- Identification of needs/problems or constrains facing the region/country without Justification (2 mark)
- Identification with Justification (3 marks)
b. Has the proposed action a clear identification of the needs and constraints facing the Region/Country?
- No need mentioned (1 mark)
- Identification of needs/problems or constrains facing the region/country without Justification (2 mark)
- Identification with Justification (3 marks)
c. Does the proposed action respond to the identified needs and constraints facing the Firm/Applicant?
- Not mentioned ( 0 mark )
- Respond mentioned without verifiable reference (1 marks)
- Respond mentioned with verifiable reference (2 Marks).
d. Does the proposed action respond to the identified needs and constraints facing the Region/Country?
- Not mentioned ( 0 mark )
- Respond mentioned without verifiable reference (1 marks)
- Respond mentioned with verifiable reference (2 Marks).
1.3 How clearly defined and strategically chosen are those involved (final beneficiaries, target groups)? Have their needs been clearly defined and does the proposal address them appropriately? (5 Marks)
a. Are the target firms/ final beneficiaries clearly identified?
- Yes ( 1 Mark )
- No ( 0 Mark)
b. Are the needs of the target firms/ final beneficiaries clearly identified?
- No needs mentioned ( 0 mark )
- Need mentioned no ref ( 1 mark )
- Need referenced ( 2 Marks )
c. To what extent, the proposed action is relevant to the needs of the target firms/ final beneficiaries?
- Not mentioned ( 0 mark )
- Relevant ( 2 marks )
1.4 Does the proposal contain specific added-value elements, such as environmental issues, promotion of gender equality and equal opportunities, needs of disabled people, rights of minorities and rights of indigenous peoples, or innovation and best practices [and the other additional elements indicated under 1.2. of these guidelines]? (5 Marks)
- No Value added element ( 1 Mark)
- Any mentioned Value added ( 3 Marks)
- Any mentioned and convincing value added ( 5 Marks)
Assessor Name ______________________

Date of Evaluation ___________________

Assessor Signature ___________________

[JSMP II]

غير مسجلغير مسجل

اين ردودكم الكريمة و مشاركاتكم؟